Clubs aim to strike the casino jackpot

It's like the gold rush in reverse. Speculators are heading out of America's Wild West in search of the anticipated riches to emerge from the UK Government's new Gambling Bill.

If passed, the legislation is set to spark a £3.5billion betting revolution, generating huge profits for mainly US corporations who plan to transform this country's cityscape through Las Vegasstyle casinos.

But not only are the large American, South African and UK operators poised to hit the jackpot with the proposed relaxation of UK gaming laws, football is also hoping to cash in.

Leeds United this month became the latest club to forge an alliance with a gaming company when it sold land near Elland Road to Stanley Leisure for £5million.

Providing the Gambling Bill is passed by Parliament, Britain's biggest casino operator plans to build a £125m betting and leisure complex there.

It is a similar story at other clubs with Newcastle, Rangers, West Ham, Sheffield United and Hull City all revealing plans to tie up with Las Vegas-based casino groups in the last year.

Manchester City have reached agreement with South Africa's Kerzner International, while Coventry City and Gillingham are both intent on building new stadiums with space allocated for large-scale casinos.

Even Wembley Stadium is preparing for a punting parlour on its doorstep after Caesars Entertainment, the owner of Caesars Palace on the Las Vegas strip, outlined plans for a £330m regional casino development.

Prime Minister Tony Blair reckons there will be between 20 and 40 new mega-casinos built and the Wembley plan is typical of what will be on offer.

It would include 75,000 square feet of gaming space, with 1,250 slot machines (the maximum allowed in the Gambling Bill), a 400-room luxury hotel, restaurants, bars and designer shops.

The operators, working with local and regional government, also pledge to make a contribution to the wider regeneration of the area. In Wembley's case, Ann John, leader of Brent Council, said: "We will look at the proposals in detail to see how they will benefit the local community."

Given that football stadiums are often located in run-down areas, it is easy to see why local authorities could be persuaded by the wider benefits and new investment. From the casinos' perspective, football grounds make "perfect sense", according to Mike Riddy, the managing director of Stanley Leisure's gaming division. He said: "The key rationale for us are location, excellent sporting links and the availability of a large piece of land close to city centres. Also, football clubs are already seen as a leisure destination."

And most club directors need little persuasion given the income potential of these lucrative deals. Gillingham chairman Paul Scally has held talks with a number of American operators about building a casino as part of his club's proposed new stadium.

He said: "A club does not make money outside the Premier League. At Priestfield, we have a five-and-a-half acre site which is used for 45 hours a year. That is not sustainable in the new arena we are looking to build.

"If American or South African operators are going to come over here then football clubs are an ideal venue.

"From a business point of view, they will produce a lot of income but these guys are also very socially aware. They are conscious of needing to put something back into the community by putting money towards local schools and sporting facilities."

It all seems like a win-win situation until you remember why casinos are so wealthy. Their profits are swelled by compulsive gamblers who blow their cash on addictive games which are skewed in favour of the house.

Campaigners fear major social problems if the Gambling Bill is passed in its current form and there are even splits in the Cabinet on moral grounds.

Jonathan Lomax, of the Salvation Army, the charity which has been one of the most vocal opponents of the Bill, said: "Football clubs need to be very careful before supporting this incredibly controversial measure.

"Do they want their brands damaged by being associated with a rise in gambling addiction?

"Football clubs market themselves as family-based entertainment. We'd be concerned about mixing that family-orientated brand with what is clearly an adults-only activity."

Arsenal resisted the lure of building a casino as part of their plans for Emirates Stadium, a decision that may stem from a long-term marketing agenda.

Michael Stirling, of law firm Field Fisher Waterhouse, which advises football clubs on investment, does not anticipate Manchester United, Liverpool or Chelsea following the trend, either.

He said: "The bigger clubs will probably wait and see. And I would advise them not to jump in. This is not a proven business operation yet and casinos do have a slightly seedy image that could damage a brand."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in