Hunt members cleared of breaching fox-hunting ban

Not guilty verdicts were entered in the case of John Finnegan and Rhys Matcham at Leicester Magistrates’ Court.
John Finnegan (left) and Rhys Matcham outside Leicester Magistrates’ Court, where they were cleared of breaching the 2004 Hunting Act (PA)
PA Wire
Matthew Cooper25 August 2021

A huntsman and a whipper-in have been cleared of an offence under the 2004 Hunting Act part way through their trial after prosecutors reviewed the evidence of the main witness in the case.

John Oliver Finnegan, 36, and 30-year-old Rhys Matcham were both found not guilty at Leicester Magistrates’ Court after the Crown Prosecution Service accepted the case had no reasonable prospect of conviction.

The Crown had claimed footage filmed by the League Against Cruel Sports showed “a proper fox hunt going back to the olden days”.

But the first witness in the case, League Against Cruel Sports staff member Roger Swaine, told the court on Tuesday that he could not see where Matcham was looking when a fox was seen to emerge from a covert.

Defence lawyer Stephen Welford then asked Mr Swaine: “It’s perfectly reasonable to suggest that hounds were in that bit of covert, they had found an artificial trail… and a fox popped out. That is one possibility, is it not?”

Mr Swaine answered: “Yes.”

Rhys Matcham outside Leicester Magistrates’ Court before he was found not guilty (Matthew Cooper/PA)
PA Wire

Explaining the Crown’s decision to drop the case on Wednesday, before Finnegan and Matcham had given evidence, prosecutor Mark Fielding said: “The Crown Prosecution Service have a duty to review the prospects of success of a matter at all times, up to and including the end of the case.

“Suffice to say, having listened to Mr Swaine giving clearly honest and truthful evidence in cross-examination, for which he is to be commended, my impression, which I communicated to the reviewing lawyer, was that this case no longer had a reasonable prospect of success.

“Bearing in mind what the Crown are asking the court to do is interpret actions of the hunt as we saw on the film, the concessions made by Mr Swaine… reduce the prospects of success such that there are no longer any reasonable prospects of success.”

Immediately after Mr Fielding’s comments, the chairman of the three-strong magistrates’ bench entered not guilty verdicts on both defendants.

Finnegan, who lives at the premises of the Quorn Hunt in Kirby Bellars, near Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire and Matcham, of Kennel Drive, Badminton south Gloucestershire, both denied illegally hunting a wild mammal with dogs on land near Breedon-on-the-Hill, Leicestershire, on February 4 last year.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in