Lobbyists scrutinised in peer probe

12 April 2012

The influence of lobbyists in the House of Lords will come under increasing scrutiny later as official inquiries continue into the cash-for-influence row engulfing four Labour peers.

Lords Leader Baroness Royall has already pledged to toughen the upper chamber's anti-sleaze rules when she launched two parliamentary probes into claims Labour members were ready to change legislation in return for money.

Lord Truscott, Lord Moonie, Lord Taylor of Blackburn and Lord Snape are accused of entering into negotiations, involving fees of up to £120,000, with Sunday Times reporters posing as lobbyists for a foreign firm.

All four strenuously deny any wrongdoing but they face the possibility of a police probe after the Liberal Democrats filed a complaint with Scotland Yard.

And Lord Moonie, a former defence minister, also faces separate questions over his decision to give a Parliamentary pass to someone previously stripped of such access because of his arms industry lobbying links.

The four peers will give evidence to the House of Lords interests sub-committee privately this week, while Lady Royall has been holding talks with them in her role as Labour's leader in the second chamber.

Answering an urgent question on the issue, Lady Royall said the sub-committee on interests had already started investigating and that the chairman of the Privileges Committee, Lord Brabazon of Tara, was carrying out a wider review of punishments, raising suggestions peers caught breaking rules could face expulsion or suspension.

Currently peers found to have broken conduct rules can only be ordered to apologise to the House.

Lord Snape, a former government whip, and Lord Taylor both used the debate to apologise for anything they had done to bring the chamber into disrepute but also to strongly deny any wrongdoing.

House of Lords rules ban paid advocacy, but many observers believe there are "grey areas" relating to consultancy services and advice offered for a fee by some peers, who receive expenses, but no salary, for their work in Parliament's second chamber.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in