Independence would turn Scotland into soft underbelly for terrorists, security think-tank warns

 
Blind spots: Alex Salmond's plan to replace security has been criticised
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

An independent Scotland would be a “soft underbelly”, providing a haven for terrorists and organised criminals wanting to target Britain, the UK’s leading security think-tank warned today.

The Royal United Services Institute said Alex Salmond’s plan to replace the protection given by MI5, MI6 and GCHQ with a new Scottish Security and Intelligence Agency raised serious concerns and would leave the nation with “considerable blind spots”.

It said national security would be “compromised” as a result and Scottish failure to establish a “credible” intelligence agency would give hostile agents and criminals a route into the UK.

The new warning will add to the debate about the impact of a Scottish breakaway if voters north of the border back the “yes” campaign in September’s referendum on independence.

It follows a claim last year by Home Secretary Theresa May that Edinburgh will find it “very difficult” to protect its citizens against terrorism if Scotland splits from the rest of the UK.

Mr Salmond, Scotland’s First Minister, has hit back by publishing plans for a new Scottish Security and Intelligence Agency which he claims will provide effective security.

But in a new report the Royal United Services Institute highlights significant weaknesses in the proposals, including Scotland’s potential loss of access to the “Five Eyes” intelligence sharing deal Britain has with the US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

Professor Michael Clarke, the think-tank’s director general, said: “At the moment, Scotland is not a haven for terrorism. It’s a relatively benign environment. But an independent Scotland that fails to set up an effective intelligence agency will be a very attractive niche for terrorists and organised crime. It will be a soft underbelly.

“Our analysis is that Scotland could not create a meaningful intelligence agency that was credible with other agencies, at least for some time, and while Scotland was failing to do that, the security of the rest of the British isles would be compromised.”

The Standard debate on Scottish independence, chaired by Emily Maitliss, is at 6.30pm on Monday, June 30 at Guildhall, Gresham Street, EC2. Free admission but strictly ticket-only. Apply at standard.co.uk/scotland

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in