Peers demand ditching of Troubles amnesty in Government defeat

A former Northern Ireland secretary pointed out the contentious immunity measure has been ‘almost universally condemned’ in the region.
The House of Lords supported a demand to remove the contentious immunity provision from the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill (Dominic Lipinski/PA)
PA Archive
Nick Lester26 June 2023
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

The Government has suffered a defeat as peers backed stripping out a key part of controversial plans aimed at dealing with Northern Ireland’s troubled past which critics had branded an amnesty.

The House of Lords supported by 197 votes to 185, majority 12, a demand to remove the contentious immunity provision from the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill.

The move to ditch it was spearheaded by Labour former Northern Ireland secretary Lord Murphy of Torfaen, who pointed out the measure had been “almost universally condemned” in the region.

The Government had proposed the new law would provide immunity for people accused of crimes during the Troubles, as long as they co-operate with a new truth recovery body, known as the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR).

The Bill would also halt future civil cases and inquests linked to killings during the conflict.

Despite the Government introducing a string of amendments to the draft legislation, it remains widely opposed by political parties, the Irish Government and victims’ groups.

In a further setback for the Government, peers voted by 203 to 179, majority 24, for a move to ensure a minimum standard for case reviews by the ICRIR.

This would require investigations are conducted to criminal standards, along the lines of Operation Kenova, which saw former Bedfordshire chief constable Jon Boutcher lead fresh probes into a number of atrocities.

The defeats set the stage for a tussle between the unelected chamber and Government known as parliamentary ping-pong, when legislation moves between the Lords and Commons.

On the conditional immunity measure, Lord Murphy said: “This is the most contentious and controversial part of the Bill. It is almost universally condemned in Northern Ireland.”

The Government saw off challenges relating to the bringing of public prosecutions and the bar on inquests, investigations and inquiries into killings during the conflict.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in