Cameron's 'nudge unit' should be given the elbow, says Labour MP

10 April 2012
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

A unit set up in Whitehall to encourage people to take better life choices came under fire today after its staff racked up an £8,000 travel bill.

Labour MP Luciana Berger said the behavioural insight team, based in the Cabinet Office, was an "extravagance" at a time when householders were feeling the pinch.

It was formed to apply the theory that people's habits can be changed without government regulation, instead nudging them in the direction they should go.

Nicknamed the "nudge unit" it has been focusing on five key areas: how to improve organ donations, stopping smoking, promoting greener cars, food hygiene and a project to encourage charitable giving.

But Mrs Berger dubbed the unit the "Prime Minister's vanity project" only days after an influential group of peers said nudges alone were unlikely to make people act differently.

Cabinet Office minister Oliver Letwin has also admitted the £500,000 team is experimental and there is no evidence it will work.

Questions by Ms Berger uncovered that the seven-strong unit and its academic advisers had run up travel expenses of £8,198 since September last year - about £750 a month.

But the Liverpool Wavertree MP said it had not delivered any solid results, saying: "Right now household budgets are being squeezed by rising prices and higher taxes.

It is incredible that at the same time these hardworking taxpayers are having to fork out thousands of pounds towards travel costs for the Prime Minister's vanity project.

"Despite these costs we are yet to see any concrete benefits from the so- called 'nudge unit'. It is hard to see how ministers can justify this extravagance when they are cutting spending for our police and schools."

But a spokesman for the Cabinet Office insisted the team had made a "big difference" in several areas, including changing the wording on tax demands which had "significantly" increased payment rates. "These travel costs cover both the Cabinet Office staff as well as the unpaid advisory team," the spokesman added.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in