Ken broke affordable homes rule over towers

Approved: the planned 800-flat development in Victoria

Ken Livingstone was accused of "rank hypocrisy" over his cheap homes policy today after it emerged he had personally agreed to a huge residential development.

Despite the Mayor's own target that 50 per cent of new homes in London should be "affordable", not one of the 800 flats in Victoria was earmarked as low-cost.

The Evening Standard has discovered he stood to get £200 million from developers for his transport budget if he approved two 40-storey towers. City Hall documents show his planners backed the proposal for the blocks, partly because developers Land Securities were offering huge sums to be spent on upgrading Victoria Tube station.

The Mayor is also facing claims he misled Londoners after he declared this week he had "no idea" why the Victoria plan lacked cheap housing. He stated "it's not a scheme that's come to me".

But Standard reporters have discovered he personally approved the scheme last November after GLA's planners gave it the green light.

In a letter to Westminster City Council, the GLA's head of planning Giles Dolphin stated: "The Mayor has concluded that the principle of the redevelopment is acceptable."

The GLA makes clear City Hall decided the lack of affordable housing was compensated for by the funding for Transport for London. "None of these units will be affordable," it states.

"The proposal does include £111.7 million towards transport infrastructure works (£217.9million after on-costs such as fees, contingencies-cost inflation and finance are added), which the applicant argues off-sets the requirement for affordable housing. These works cannot currently be funded via public sector means. It is therefore accepted that additional monies created by the development are targeted for transport purposes."

Tory-run Westminster opposed the proposals because they lacked affordable housing. It was also unconvinced by the Tube upgrade.

As well as breaching the Mayor's "affordable homes" rules, the flats would breach his guidelines on the proportion of family homes and density - and affect views of Buckingham Palace and St Paul's.

However, City Hall planners considered the blocks "beautiful additions" to London's skyline. The GLA also backed the idea of demolishing Victoria bus station - partly because bendy buses "have operational difficulties" there.

In a key plank of his election bid, Mr Livingstone this week accused Tories of "betraying" families.

But his Tory rival Boris Johnson said the Victoria scandal showed the Mayor had been caught red handed and blew a hole in his claims to be on the side of the poor. He said: "It's utter and rank hypocrisy and an absolute travesty of the truth."

Angela Harvey, Westminster's Cabinet member for housing, said: "The GLA report on the Victoria development makes it absolutely clear the Mayor decided in favour of luxury flats instead of affordable housing he says he wants.

"Unlike Ken, we want affordable homes for over 300 local families."

The Mayor's office did not respond. Mr Livingstone said his target was for London as a whole.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in