Crowded UK (but not Kensington and Chelsea) - population soars almost everywhere apart from affluent London borough

 
Population down: Affluent Kensington and Chelsea Pic: Graham Hussey
Pic: Graham Hussey
16 August 2012

Kensington and Chelsea is one of the few areas in the UK where the population dipped during the last ten years, according to union research.

The London borough was alongside Blackpool, Blaenau Gwent, Stockport and St Helens as one of the only places in the country to see such a fall.

Research by union GMB showed there was extra strain on utilities and services because everywhere else in the country, populations increased between 2001 and 2011.

The study of 174 shire counties, London and metropolitan boroughs and unitary authorities in England and Wales, revealed population growth ranging from 3.2% in the North East to 14% across London.

The analysis showed that there were 41 areas of England and Wales where the population grew by 10% or more between 2001 and 2011, including Tower Hamlets in London (29.6%), Manchester (28.1%), Newham (26.3%), Hackney (21.4%), Westminster (21.%) - all London, Milton Keynes (20.2%) and Hounslow (19.6%).

The analysis revealed that the population rose in all 10 regions in England and Wales between 2001 and 2011, led by London (14%), and followed by the East Midlands 8.7%, East of England 8.5%, South East 7.9 %, South West 7.3%, Yorkshire and The Humber 6.4% West Midlands 6.4%, Wales 5.5%, North West 4.8% and North East 3.2%.

National officer Brian Strutton said: "These figures show that many areas need more schools, more housing, improved transport links, more health facilities, upgrades in utilities like water and more recreation facilities. There is a need for a step change in how we care for growing number of the elderly and in particular how can we help them stay in their own homes for as long as possible.

"National and local government and the private sector must use this growth in population as the springboard to reflate the economy by providing the social infrastructure this population needs.

"Leadership is needed to deliver such a programme as well as the £200 billion investment to deliver essential energy and infrastructure projects. It is a bigger challenge than delivering the Olympics."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in