Criminals selling cut-price satellite television packages from London stores

 
Unfair: Nicola Humphries pays £27 a month for Sky but is angered that others are not paying for receiving the same service
BBC
10 February 2014
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Criminal gangs are illegally selling premium satellite TV packages for a fraction of their real cost from London stores, an investigation has revealed.

While legitimate Sky movie and sports packages can cost more than £800 a year, they are being offered for £10 a month in high-street shops in  the capital.

BBC One’s Inside Out was given access to the City of London’s anti-piracy unit as they carried out a raid on the suspected ring leader of an illegal satellite TV gang.

The programme’s investigators also carried out secret filming at a shop in Greenwich and Upton Park following reports “magic boxes” were allegedly being sold to the public.

Computer experts who analysed purchased set-top boxes said they had been encrypted to allow digital messages to be sent to the pirates to hack into Sky TV signals.

Keith Cottenden, an investigator with computer forensics firm CY40R, said: “People see their monthly subscription of  £30, £40 and they can get that much cheaper.

“A lot of people jump straight in and say ‘yes that’s for me’, not realising what they’re doing is a criminal offence.”

An annual full Sky subscription costs £807 a year. A similar Virgin package costs £987 while BT costs £815. By contrast an illegal subscription costing £120 presents an attractive deal for many householders.

However, TV companies claim fraudsters are pushing up the prices for ordinary customers.

Nicola Humphries said she weighed-up several suppliers before deciding to pay £27 a month to Sky for a multi-channel package.

Read More

She said: “I think if I’m paying £27 pounds a month and someone else is getting a service and not paying for that service, I’m thinking why should they be getting that service?”

Eddie Leviten of the Federation Against Copyright Theft said: “Is it fair, is it right, is it just that somebody should be able to steal from someone else and that person won’t be paid for their work? That impacts not just on that one single person but impacts on their family.”

Inside Out London is on tonight at 7.30pm.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in