11 everyday phrases you might be saying incorrectly

Close enough?: get these 11 phrases right to avoid embarrassment
Shutterstock / file404
Abby Jackson21 March 2017

The English language can be tricky.

Homophones — words that sound alike but are spelled differently — aren't the only trap to avoid. People often use a word in place of one that sounds similar.

These malapropisms often have the unfortunate effect of making the speaker seem ignorant.

Read below to see 11 examples of words and phrases that often come out incorrectly.

1. For all 'intents and purposes' — not for all 'intensive purposes'

If you say "for all intensive purposes," you mean "for all these very thorough purposes," which doesn't make any sense.

On the other hand, "for all intents and purposes" means "for all the reasons I did this and all the outcomes." It's a much stronger cliche.

2. You've got another 'think' coming — not you've got another 'thing' coming

The phrase was originally, "If that's what you think, you've got another think coming." We just dropped the first clause. Still, this may be a case where the misuse of the phrase now seems to be more popular that the original. Even former US President Barack Obama has used "thing" instead of "think."

3. One 'and' the same — not one 'in' the same

"One in the same" refers to one thing in a group of other things that look the same — meaningless. "One and the same" means that two things are alike.

4. 'Deep-seated' — not 'deep-seeded'

This phrase means something is firmly fixed in place, not that it is planted deeply, as the latter implies.

5. Case 'in' point — not case 'and' point

"Case in point" means, "Here's an example of this point I'm trying to make." The version with "and" makes them two different things, which isn't helpful to your argument at all.

For the record, the plural is "cases in point."

6. Should/could/would 'have' — not should/could/would 'of'

Using "of" here is just wrong. You need to pair a verb with another verb. Otherwise, people will think "of" what?

7. Nip it in the 'bud' — not nip it in the 'butt'

This phrase should imply you cut a new bud (off a plant), not bit someone in the backside.

8. 'Wreak' havoc — not 'wreck' havoc

To "wreck" havoc means to destroy havoc, which is the exact opposite of this phrase's meaning. When you "wreak havoc," you're spreading chaos, anarchy, and destruction everywhere, which is really fun.

9. I 'couldn't' care less — not I 'could' care less

If you "could" care less, you're admitting there are other, less important things in world, which takes away the sting of your comment. By saying you "couldn't" care less, that means nothing else exists on the planet that matters less you. Major burn.

10. Please 'proceed' — not please 'precede'

To proceed means to move forward, while to precede means to come before.

11. 'Supposedly' — not 'supposably'

"Supposably" isn't even a word. It's a slight but important distinction.

Read more from Business Insider UK

• The 19 richest Asians in the UK
• The UK's youngest billionaire is officially off the market
• The 10 best airports in the world

 

Read the original article on Business Insider UK
© 2016. Follow Business Insider UK on Twitter

 

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in