The Met is being torn apart by its own war

Brought down by dirty tricks: Andy Hayman must take some credit for the Met's improved tracking of terrorists
12 April 2012

The outrage over the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes has made it easy to miss that since his killing the Met has got a lot better at tracking terrorists.

Instead of innocent families seeing armed officers burst into their living rooms, there have been dozens of successful prosecutions. So good have the police become, I read the director of MI5's estimate last month that 2,000 potential terrorists were at large as a warning against complacency. The authorities can't be lucky all the time.

At least some credit must go to Andy Hayman, the Met's head of counter-terrorism. He and his fellow officers not only made arrests but also made the case for tougher laws far better than successive Home Secretaries. Earlier this year I was stopped in my tracks and forced to reconsider dearly held civil libertarian beliefs when I heard Hayman's deputy, Peter Clarke, describe how suicide bombers were different from every other type of criminal the Met had encountered.

So there you had it. Hard-headed officers were confronting an unprecedented threat and making as good a fist of it as anyone had a right to expect. Until yesterday, that is, when Hayman resigned and we caught a glimpse of a police service driven half mad by office politics.

I don't know what to say about the accusations against him. As a journalist, I understand that no reporter can resist reports that he'd been close to an officer with the fantastically exotic name of Sergeant Heidi Tubby. But I notice there have been no specific allegations.

A few weeks ago, I heard Ken Livingstone defend Hayman from accusations of fiddling expenses by pointing out that as recently as the late Nineties no one checked whether the Met was wasting money or not. I'm not sure Livingstone's defence will wash with many readers. Rules are rules, after all, and if the police don't uphold them, why should anyone else? But, again, I don't know what to make of the charges as nothing was proved.

I do know that leaks on the scale Hayman has endured speak of a chaotic organisation. When Channel 4 News alleged last night that Hayman had made hundreds of calls to one of the investigators into the death of de Menezes, one of his colleagues sounded close to despair when he responded by saying Hayman was an able man whose career had been killed by politicking. "There's no support. None of these things are hanging offences, and Hayman is adamant he has done nothing wrong. But it wouldn't go away and he felt that he had to do the right thing and walk away from it."

Even if we had the best police force in the world, it couldn't protect us from every bomber. As it is, I have an awful feeling that the Met's senior officers are as interested in fighting each other as fighting terrorism.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in