£20bn Trident useless, says military chief

BRITAIN'S Trident nuclear deterrent is "completely useless" and its £20 billion cost would be better spent on conventional weapons, former military chiefs said today.

In an attack on Labour's decision to renew the nuclear system, the former head of the Armed Forces, Field Marshal Lord Bramall, said Trident was neither independent nor effective in coping with terror threats. He added that huge sums being used to replace the ageing submarines that carry the ballistic missiles could be better spent on warplanes, ships, tanks and weapons desperately needed by the Armed Forces.

Lord Bramall, with retired Army generals Lord Ramsbotham and Sir Hugh Beach, wants to restart the debate over Trident's renewal, approved by the Commons in March 2007 despite a large rebellion by Labour MPs.

Lord Ramsbotham, who was "quite certain" his doubts are shared by some serving military chiefs, called Trident a "Cold War weapon".

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in